Click here
to look for "chess" with the Google search engine.
|
(Navigation bar ******* © A.J. Goldsby, 2015. **************** Click HERE ****************
**************** Buy a book
**************** Click HERE
... |
This
is a very famous chess game, and I wanted to at least briefly annotate it
for my websites. It contains one of the most astonishing chess moves ever played, as well as one of the more famous King-Hunts of all time.
1.d4 Nf6;
2.c4 d6; At this stage of development of the theory of this line, a fianchetto on move two, (...g6); was not played very much. One should also remember that this was a very important event, and Kotov obviously cannot be blamed for not wanting to play a system that was considered - at that time - to be both frivolous and dangerous for Black.
[ The modern move order is:
{But it would be another 10-15
years before Masters began
using this
3.Nf3 Nbd7; 4.Nc3 e5; {See the diagram - just below.}
********************* *********************
This is - pretty much - a system
that masters (today) would refer
to as:
[ Also possible is:
4...c6!?;
{Diagram?}
5.e4 Be7; ('!?')
[ Black could also try:
GM Hristos Banikas
(2490) -
GM Miroslav Tosic (2525);
6.Be2 0-0;
7.0-0 c6; 8.Qc2!, "+/=" {See
the diagram - just diagram.}
********************* *********************
White has a very normal, solid edge out this opening - at this particular point in the game.
[ Another move would be:
8...Re8;
9.Rd1 Bf8;
The second player's method of
development is similar to the main
lines of the closed
Now b4 might have worked ...
[ Also possible would have been: C. Kamp - D. Loschinski; BL2 - W9192 / GER; 10,1991. ]
11.d5,
('!?') ("This is correct,
White gains space and fixes the
center." - Max Euwe
My take is that it is:
[
Interesting was:
11.b3!?,
"+/=" {Diagram?} *****************************************
Another interpretation is:
11...Nc5;
12.Be3 Qc7; 13.h3!?, (hmmmmm)
COUNTERPOINT: [ 13.a3!?, ("+/=") - CM 9000 ]
13...Bd7;
Now one program likes dxc6! for
White. But modern programs
- while nearly
15.Nd2!?,
('!')
(defends e4)
[ Or White could play:
(</=) 15.b3!?
Nh5!?; "~" {Diagram?}
15...Rab8;
(Maybe - '!') [ Also playable was: 15...h6!? ]
16.Nb3!?,
"+/=" (Maybe - '!')
{Diag?} White is still - very clearly - better in this position.
[
White could also play: *******************************************************
Another way for White to go
would have been:
16...Nxb3;
17.Qxb3 c5!;
One writer - very foolishly - wrote
that Black ... "was now better." But
a check
[ Not
</= 17...Bg7?; 18.Bb6 Qc8;
19.Nb5! cxb5; 20.cxb5 Nxe4!?;
18.Kh2!?,
{See the diagram ... just below.}
********************* *********************
Another idea is to play Qc2 followed
by Qd2 ... to dominate the dark
squares on the
[
>/=
18.Qc2! Bg7!?; 19.Rb1,
"+/=" {Diagram?}
18...Kh8!?;
19.Qc2 Ng8!?; 20.Bg4 Nh6!?; (Maybe - '?!')
<< 20...Bh6 would be a more solid
line, exchanging off his "bad" Bishop;
but then
[ Maybe a little better was:
21.Bxd7 Qxd7;
22.Qd2 Ng8; 23.g4!?, (Probably - '?!') *******
Nunn points out that in a position
where two sets of minor pieces have
already been
However ... I should point out that
White still holds a very solid edge
here ...
[ Best was:
>/= 23.Nb5!,
'±' {Diagram?}
Black's next move is a "live or
die" type of decision. Kotov
prefers active counterplay ... 1r2rbnk/1p1q3p/3p2p1/p1pPpp2/2P1P1P1/2N1BP1P/PP1Q3K/2RR4; B - 0 24
This move is wrong ... and also
highly illogical here.
[ Correct was the continuation of:
( The move of: 25.Qd3!?, "~" {Diagram?}
25...Qxf5; 26.Rg1,
"+/=" ('±') {Diagram?}
24...Be7;
25.Rg1!? Rf8!?; ('?!')
Now the computer says that
White should definitely play
g4xf5! here.
[ Maybe better would have been:
27...gxf5;
28.Rg2?, {Diagram?} 1r4nk/1p1qbr1p/3p4/p1pPpp2/2P1P3/2N1BP1P/PP1Q2RK/5R2 B - 0 28
Nunn prefers 28.f4! for White, I like
Fritz's suggestion of exchanging
Pawns on f5,
[ After the following moves:
28...f4!;
Now according to several different
{strong} computer programs, White's
edge
29.Bf2 Rf6!;
30.Ne2?, ('??') {See
the diagram - - - just below here.}
********************* *********************
Nunn gives White's last move
(Ne2?) a whole question mark ... [ >/= 30.h4[] Rh6; 31.Qe1 Qe8; "=/+" ]
Now
it is Black's turn to play a
move in this position. What move
would you play here?
Upon second inspection however,
one should note that it did not
require a tremendous
"This brilliant sacrifice introduces
one of the most exciting King-hunts
of the
[ Also good was:
30...b5!?; "=/+"
{Diagram?}
White must capture the Queen,
it is the only legal move that is
available to Averbakh.
********************* *********************
This is a very good place for a "look-see" ... {a diagram} ...
[
A sizeable improvement was:
(
A big mistake would be: ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
And not: ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Also bad would be:
34...Rg8!!;
35.Nh5 Rhg6!;
"-/+" {Diagram?} White's next move is 100% forced. *******
[ One very good variation ...
that clearly illustrates some of ***
( Nunn only gives the VASTLY
weaker continuation of: ***
36...exf4; 37.Qxf4!?,
{Diagram?}
( For example: 37.Qc3+ Ne5+; 38.Qxe5+ dxe5; 39.d6!?,
37...Rg6+!; 38.Kh3 Rxf4;
"-/+" {Diagram?} *******
34...Rf8+;
35.Kg4 Nf6+!; 36.Kf5 Ng8+!; 37.Kg4 Nf6+!?; (Really - '??')
With this cowardly play, Black forever
scars a great game and throws away
One could argue that Black's
method ... of repeating the moves,
and only finding
[
Black could win instantly with: ****************************************************
( Bad for White would be: ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
---> Or White can try: *****************************************************
(Returning to the main path
of our analysis line, here.)
39.Kf5,
{Diagram?} ( Not </= 39.Kxg5?? Rh5#. )
39...Ng4+!!;
40.Kxg4 Rg8!;
41.Kf5 Be7;
{Diagram?}
42.Bh4 Bxh4;
43.Qxh4 Rxh4;
{Diagram?} 38.Kf5 Nxd5+!?;
(Maybe '?!' or even '?')
This is a truly wild position ... White
has plenty of material ... ... ...
39.Kg4 Nf6+;
40.Kf5 Ng8+;
This means the game is no longer
a contest between two players, but
a challenge
Kotov's team of {many} Masters
worked out the win in leisure, free
of tension and ******************************************************************
41.Kg4 Nf6+;
42.Kf5 Ng8+; 43.Kg4 Bxg5!;
********************* *********************
Some have criticized this as an error, but at this point, I do not think that it matters anymore.
[ Or White could try:
44...Rf7;
('!') 45.Bh4,
('!?') *******
[ Even worse would be: ( Or 46.Kf5 Rf6#. ) 46...Rgxg6+; 47.Kf5 Ne7#. ] ******* 45...Rg6+!;
46.Kh5 Rfg7; 47.Bg5!? Rxg5+;
48.Kh4 Nf6;
(White's next move is forced.) 51.Qb8+!? Rg8; ("-/+") {Diagram?} WHITE RESIGNS. (0-1) (White must give up the Queen to avoid mate here.)
To some - this is an 'immortal'
game of chess, but to me it was
ruined by Kotov's ****************************************************************
BIBLIOGRAPHY: [The 'Mammoth Book' Of]
"The World's Greatest Chess Games." ****************************************************************** (By)
Carroll & Graf Publishers, Inc. /
19 West 21st Street, Suite # 601 *****************************************************************
Copyright (c) LM A.J. Goldsby I
0 - 1
|