Tactics
School, GAME SIX (# 6)
Click
HERE to see an
explanation of the symbols that I use.
A training game played on the Internet.
(Against John_Anderson)
(On Chess-dot-net)
The time control
was like 10 minutes for the game, with like a 5 second delay.
A
beginner might
be confused by this opening. We start off with d4, then
appear to be heading for
a Nimzo-Indian. Then White opts for a fianchetto.
***
1.d4 Nf6;
2.Nf3
e6; 3.g3,
I wanted to reach the Catalan Opening.
I
experimented with this opening as a teen-ager, but my initial tries were ...
er
... well, let us say - much less than successful!
I have been really enamored
of this opening ever since I saw a game where
a GM used it, (The Catalan); to crush a top-rated
IM. He did it in 30-something
moves, and he hardly seemed to break a sweat.
(Around the mid-1980's.)
[ If 3.c4 d5; and we have reached a normal
Q.G.D. ]
3...d5;
4.Bg2 c5!?;
Black attacks the
center.
This is a little dangerous, White would have the opportunity to blow
the game wide open.
I would prefer the simple ...Be7;
followed by castling,
before undertaking
any such operations.
**********
[ The main line would be a continuation
something like:
4...Be7;
5.c4 0-0; 6.0-0 dxc4; {Diagram?}
A delayed form of
the Open Variation.
***
( Black can also play the "Closed Variation"
with:
6...Nbd7!?;
7.Qc2 c6; 8.Nbd2 b6!?; 9.b3!?,
{Diagram?}
This slow method used to be
much in vogue, but the pawn
break on e4 was worth a look.
(Possibly
another option for White was: 9.e4!?, "/\" {Diag?}
with at least a very
small edge. "+/=")
9...Bb7; 10.Bb2 Rc8; 11.e4!? c5!;
12.exd5 exd5; 13.dxc5
dxc4!;
14.Nxc4 b5!; 15.Nce5 Rxc5;
"~" {Diagram?}
Several books - which include
ECO and two of my books on the
Catalan - consider this position to be equal.
(I think
Black might have the better chances, or it is at least unclear.)
GM V. Smyslov
- GM P. Benko; Monte Carlo, 1968.
See the book: "(The) Catalan
Opening,"
by Oleg Moiseyev and also Grigory Ravinsky.
[ (c) 1984. ACP /
Batsford. ]
Chapter # 16, (Line # B2.); beginning on page # 133. )
***
7.Qc2 a6; 8.Qxc4,
"+/=" {Diagram?}
This position is slightly better for White, he has more
space and an
extra center pawn.
This has occurred in hundreds of
master-level games. One of the
more recent games, featuring two really strong
players, is:
GM U. Andersson -
GM A. Beliavsky; Reggio Emilia, ITA; 1990.
*****
( "Modern
Chess Openings" gives the continuation
{instead} of:
8.a4!? Bd7; 9.Qxc4 Bc6; 10.Bg5,
{Diagram?}
Probably the most thematic move.
( Bad for White is: 10.Nc3?! b5!; 11.axb5?? axb5; {Diagram?}
and the first player must lose material.
("-/+") )
10...a5!?; {Diagram?}
All the books give this move
here. (And I am not sure why.)
It permanently weakens the b5-square for Black.
(Black wishes to put a Knight on the b4-square, but I am not sure
this solves
all of his opening problems.)
(Maybe 10...b5!?; "~")
11.Nc3 Na6;
12.Rac1 Nb4; 13.Rfd1 Rc8; 14.Bxf6 Bxf6;
15.e4,
"+/=" 15...b6; {Diagram?} The end of
the column.
16.d5!?,
{Diagram?} A rather predictable pawn push.
(And probably
fairly strong!)
(16.Ne5!?; Or 16.Ne1!?)
16...exd5; 17.exd5
Bb7; 18.Nd4 Ba6; 19.Ncb5!? Bxd4;
{Diag?}
Black does not wish to allow the move,
Knight-to-c6.
20.Rxd4,
"~" (Maybe - "+/=") {Diagram?}
"This is slightly more favorable
for White in a complex position."
- GM Nick de Firmian.
V. Mikhalevsky -
E. Rozentalis; Beersheba, 1997.
[ See MCO - 14, page # 512,
column # 1,
and notes
# (a.) through note # (d.). ] )
]
**********
After castling White decides to
really open the game up.
5.0-0 Nc6; 6.c4!? dxc4; 7.Qa4 Bd7;
This is probably a fairly wise precaution, as Black is behind in
development.
[ Possibly dangerous is: 7...cxd4!?;
8.Nxd4!?, "/\"
White has an
initiative. (8.Ne5!?)
]
Both sides will now finish their development,
Black is especially clever in
almost neutralizing White's advantage. (I had a
growing sense of deja-vu
during this game, I was sure I had seen something like
it before.)
8.Qxc4 cxd4; 9.Nxd4 Rc8; 10.Nc3 Nxd4; 11.Qxd4
Bc5; 12.Qh4 Bc6;
13.Bxc6+ Rxc6; 14.Rd1 Rd6;
Apparently this is probably an inaccuracy, although I went through
this game
close to ten times before I picked up on it.
[ Apparently Black had to
play: 14...Qb6; 15.Bh6 Bf8;
16.Rd2 e5!?;
17.Be3, "+/=" {Diagram?}
Apparently this had
all been played before ... in a very famous game.
(This answers why I felt I had
seen this game before, I am sure I had
played through this game in some
book, somewhere.)
GM Z. Ribli - GM L. Ljubojevic; The Olympiad,
(A FIDE tt).
Buenos Aries, ARG;
1978.
(White won a nice game in around 50 moves.)
]
***
15.Bf4 Rxd1+;
16.Rxd1
Qb6; {See the diagram just below.}
KEY
The key position and the main reason I annotated this
game.
17.Bg5!,
(Maybe - '!!') {Diagram?}
This is very, very sharp,
but is it all really sound?
(Apparently it is.)
--->
Note: June, 2005. I ran this game by both
Shredder and ChessMaster 10th edition
a few weeks
ago. Apparently both machines find 17.Bh6!!, which is probably a little
superior to
the move actually played in the game.
*****
[ Another alternative is: </= 17.e3!? 0-0;
Probably the safest move.
(Probably too
risky is: 17...Qxb2?!; 18.Be5, "--->" {Diagram?}
White has an
attack/initiative, that is very dangerous for the
second player here.)
18.b3, "=" The position is very balanced.
***
Interesting was: 17.Na4!?
Bxf2+; 18.Kg2 Qb5; 19.Kxf2 Qxa4;
20.Rd8+! Kxd8;
21.Bc7+ Kxc7; 22.Qxa4,
"+/="
White is clearly a bit better in this position.
]
*****
17...Be7;
Black chooses a "safety first" option here.
[ Black runs
into serious trouble after taking on f2:
17...Bxf2+?!;
(Maybe - '?') {Diagram?}
Much
too risky.
18.Kf1!,
Probably the best move.
(Also good for
White is: 18.Kg2 Bc5; 19.Bxf6 gxf6;
20.Ne4, "+/=" {Diagram?} with a fairly sizable advantage
for the first player here.)
18...Bg1!?;
This was the threat that really concerned me the most.
(Black also loses after: 18...Bc5; 19.Bxf6 gxf6; 20.Qxf6
0-0;
21.Na4 Qc6; 22.Qg5+ Kh8; 23.Qxc5 Qh1+; 24.Qg1, "+/-")
19.Qa4+ Kf8; 20.e3! h6;
This is just about forced.
*******
( But not 20...Qxb2?; 21.Rd8+ Ke7; 22.Qd7#!
Also bad for Black is: </= 20...Bx33?; 21.Bxe3 Qxe3;
22.Qb4+ Ke8; 23.QxP/b7, ("+/-") with an easily won game. )
*******
21.Qa3+ Kg8; 22.Rd6 Qc7; 23.Bxf6 gxf6;
24.Kxg1,
"+/-" with a won game. (For
White.)
***
Even worse is the capture on the b2-square.
For example:
17...Qxb2?; 18.Bxf6 gxf6; 19.Qxf6,
White threatens a mate on d8.
His Queen guards c3, and he threatens
the Rook on h8. If Black castles, simply
Qg5+; picking off the Bishop
on c5.
(19.Qa4+!?)
19...Bxf2+; This is pretty much forced.
20.Kxf2 0-0; 21.Rd4,
"+/-" and Black can
resign. ]
*****
18.Qa4+ Kf8;
19.b3!?, "+/=" {Diagram?}
A simple move that
gives White a small advantage.
[ Much better was: >= 19.Qc4! Qc6;
20.Qf4, "+/="
with a considerable edge. ]
Now Black feels he is forced into giving up an
exchange.
(The rest really needs no comment.)
19...h6; 20.Be3 Bc5; 21.Bxc5+ Qxc5; 22.Rd8+ Ke7;
23.Rxh8 Qxc3; 24.Qxa7!?,
This is OK ... but maybe even better was the move, Qa3+.
[ An improvement was:
>/= 24.Qa3+! Kd7; 25.Rf8,
"+/-"
and Black falls apart. ]
24...Qe1+;
25.Kg2
Qxe2; 26.Qxb7+,
I saw Qc5+, but I was growing a little
short of time.
I was also already feeling fatigued, from the calculating effort
of the earlier mountain of complications.
[ White wins simply after:
>/= 26.Qc5+! Kd7; 27.Qc8+ Kd6;
28.Rd8+ Ke5;
29.Qc5+! Nd5; This is forced.
(29...Ke4??; 30.Rd4#)
30.Rxd5+!, ("+/-")
and now
if Black captures the Rook, White wins Black's
Queen with the skewer attack of Qe7+.
(This is the tactic I actually missed during the game!)
(I.e., 30.Rxd5+! exd5; 31.Qe7+ Kd4; 32.Qxe2, "+/-")
]
26...Nd7;
27.Ra8!?,
This is nice, but it might have been much easier to simply push
the QRP up the board.
[ >/= 27.a4,
"+/-" ]
27...Kf6;
28.Qf3+, ("+/-") Black Resigns.
(With the Queens off, his game is
hopeless. Plus he
was nearly out of time.)
Copyright
(c) A.J. Goldsby I.
[ But definitely not: 28.Qxd7?? Qe4+;
29.f3 Qxa8; "<=>" {Diagram?}
with some drawing chances for Black in the Q+P ending.
]
(Analysis initially) Generated with ChessBase
8.0
1 - 0