GOTM; January, 2013.    


Welcome to my  "Game of The Month"  feature!  (Game # 53, for January, 2013.)   (A list of all the main games on this website.) 

This is a game, that is annotated - by me - for your enjoyment. Hopefully it is done in a way that is both entertaining and also informative, there are certainly lots of diagrams - and a link to a re-play page as well. The main purpose {and thrust} of this column is to try and educate the general chess public. 

I have deeply annotated this game on my hard drive, you are welcome to contact me if you would like to try and obtain a copy. (Because of copyright violations, I ONLY offer a printed version! I simply cannot afford to "give away" the electronic version any longer ...)

This is a feature where I will try to pick a game that was recently played at the GM level. Then I will annotate it and try to basically explain what happened. ---> While I would not mind if an expert (or even a master!) enjoyed my work here, this column is aimed primarily at lower-rated players.  
(Say 1600 & below.)
 The main idea is to help lower-rated players learn the game!!! 

I hope that you enjoy this game ... feedback is both encouraged and welcome. (Please respect my copyright.) 
(This means do NOT!!! copy any of my work ... and post it on another website ... unless you get my WRITTEN permission, first.) 

     ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************     


    Click  HERE    to see an explanation of the symbols I commonly use - when annotating a chess game.     

    Click  HERE    to go to another server ... where you can search for this game in a "re-playable" format.   

    Click  HERE    to go to my channel on the "You-Tube" network/server.  (Click  HERE  to watch my "You-Tube" video on this game.)  


 The Players

gotm-jan.2013_Magnus Carlsen, 2013.jpg, 23 KB

gotm-jan.2013_Hikaru Nakamura, 2013.jpg, 13 KB

  GM Magnus Carlsen  

  GM Hikaru Nakamura  

   *******************************   

  Carlsen's page on the CG website.  

  Carlsen's FIDE profile page.  

    Nakamura's page on the CG website.  

Nakamura's FIDE profile page.  

   *******************************   

   *******************************   


gotm_jan-2013_players.jpg, 15 KB

  Introduction  

This game was an absolute standout ... and this is really stating the obvious. However, there were several pertinent reasons why I chose this game for annotation:  

  1. Carlsen's performance in this game ... indeed, (also) the entire tournament ... were simply exceptional! To ignore this player's recent results would be close to criminal conduct! 

  2. I had never featured this particular opening in my column before this game. (I generally try to feature a different opening every time I do the main game for this website.) 

  3. One {former} student felt - rather strongly - that Carlsen might be using a computer to play chess. In lieu of all the cases of cheating that have occurred recently, this was a topic that I felt that I simply could not ignore. (See my website for more cases of cheating.) I am happy to report that Magnus, while playing exceptionally strong chess, also missed moves that just about any engine will quickly find. For me - this solves the possible dilemma, I think that I can safely state that Carlsen is simply a wonderfully talented player, but there is no cause to believe that he may have used a chess engine during the actual game. (Case closed!!!!!)  (Please note - the former student used to reside in Pensacola, and has since moved to South FL ... and then out of the state.) 

  4. Please note that this analysis was NOT rushed ... I worked on it for around two weeks (maybe a bit more) ... and I probably reviewed it close to 100 times before deciding that I was ready to try and begin the long and arduous process of turning my ChessBase analysis into a decent-looking web page. Because of the care that was taken - and the fact that I used multiple (strong) chess engines to do this work, I can safely say that my analysis is not inferior to anyone else's work ... is probably much superior to most of the other pundits who might have {quickly} looked at this game.  



Note that the diagrams are fairly large, if you save them to your computer, you will be able to see and study the positions better.  
(The size that is used here is less than 1/2 the actual size of the "*.jpg" images.)  


  GM Magnus Carlsen (2861) - GM Hikaru Nakamura (2769)   
  [B32]  
  75th Tata Steel, Group "A"  
   Wijk aan Zee, NED; (R#12)  / 26,01,2013.  

  [A.J. Goldsby I]  

   ***********************************************************************************************    

This will be my "Game of The Month" for January, 2013. 

This year's edition of Tata Steel is easily one of the strongest and best ever. WC Anand participated, as did many of the world's best (and highest rated) players. 

Recently, Carlsen broke Kasparov's record as the highest rated player in the the history of chess. Now - with this game - he easily defeats the American Wunderkind ... and locks in a clear first place finish in Wijk aan Zee ... ... ... with a full round to spare!   

 

     1.e4 c5 (The Sicilian Defense.)   
Thus far, we have an asymmetrical opening, one that is the favorite of many masters when playing for a win with the Black pieces. 
(Bobby Fischer and Garry Kasparov were both big fans of this opening.)  

 

   *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***    *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***    *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***    *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***    

Now Black uses the move order that was first seen in the 1800's. Black plays his QN to c6 on his second move ... ... ... 
(Today, most masters employ the move order of: 1.e4, c5; 2.Nf3, d6; 3.d4, cxd4; 4.NxP/d4, Nf6; 5.Nc3, etc.)  

     2.Nf3 Nc63.d4 cxd44.Nxd4 (Open Sicilian)   
Thus far, we have a standard ... and a very commonly played branch of this opening.   

With 4...Nf6; 5.Nc3, we reach the main lines --- 5...a6; is a Najdorf; while 5...g6; is the much feared (and often maligned) variation known as The Sicilian Dragon. 
[I have probably over 50 books on these two systems, alone.] 

 

                         [ By playing  RR  4.c3!? dxc35.Nxc3, "~"  ("compensation")   
                           when we transpose into the systems known as ... 
                           the "Smith-Morra Gambit." [more] ]   

 

     4...e5!?  (Boleslavsky)    
Once, this seemingly rash pawn advance was thought of as suicide, (Black willingly accepts a backward d-Pawn in the center.); today this motif is a common idea in many different systems of this opening. (Black willingly allows a seemingly bad pawn formation in return for active piece play.)  

4...Nf6; 5.Nc3, Nc6; would lead to the Classical Systems of the Sicilian. (Richter-Rauzer, Sozin, etc.)   

 

                         [ Instead, after the continuation of:  RR  4...Nf65.Nc3 e56.Ndb5 d67.Bg5 a68.Na3 b59.Nd5,  "+/="  
                            we reach the popular structure (e.g., the main lines) of the Sveshnikov Sicilian. 
                            (For a highly detailed analysis of these lines, please see my column for April, 2004.) ]   

 

     5.Nb5 d6 (flexible)   
Black keeps many of his options open with this move, in some lines, it is beneficial for the second player to forego ...Nf6 in favor of placing that steed on e7. (...Nge7) Another common plan of this particular branch of the Sicilian is that Black, by delaying the development of his KN, retains the option of playing ...B/f8-e7-g5; to exchange off the KB and thus rid himself 
of his potentially "bad" Bishop.  

Note that Black also has the option of playing an early pawn break of ...f7-f5 as well; and with an eventual ...Nf6; he can also transpose back into some of the bywaters of the Sveshnikov Sicilian.   

 

 

gotm_jan-2013__pos1.jpg, 56 KB

   r1bqkbnr/pp3ppp/2np4/1N2p3/4P3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQKB1R w KQkq - 0 6   

 

This system is known as ... "The Kalishnikov Sicilian."  [more]  
(I have seen Nak play this in blitz on the "Play-Chess" server, yet I could find no tournament examples of him using this system over the last few years.)   

 

     6.g3!? (Square control, possible fianchetto of White's LSB.)   
According to a book on the Kalishnikov, this is a relatively harmless line, with no real teeth. I think that the main reason that Carlsen chose this particular branch of this opening was that it was unlikely that Nakamura could have thoroughly prepared this exact variation for tournament play. If this is true, it also means that that Carlsen probably has prepared it himself - in some depth.  

 

 

gotm_jan-2013__pos2.jpg, 56

   r1bqkbnr/pp3ppp/2np4/1N2p3/4P3/6P1/PPP2P1P/RNBQKB1R b KQkq - 0 6   

 

6.g2-g3 is like the 6th choice of the computer's opening book.  

 

                         [ According to the "Powerbook" the main line here would be:   
                            6.c4 Be77.N1c3 a68.Na3 Be69.Be2,    
                            This seems to be the most commonly played line for White, at this particular fork in the road.   

                                           ( Or Black could try: 9.Bd3 Bg510.0-0 Bxc111.Rxc1 Nf612.Nc2 0-0;  "~"   with an unclear position.  

                                             [ See MCO-14, page # 344; col. #01, and also note (e.). ] )   

                           Returning to the main PB line, we have the following moves:   
                           9...Bg510.0-0 Bxc111.Rxc1 Nf612.Nc2, "+/="  and White is just marginally better.   

                           See the contest: 
                           GM David Navara (2702) - GM Alexander Moiseenko (2679);  [B32] / 
                           FRA-chT; Top 12 / Mulhouse (Rnd. #6.2) / 31,05,2011.   
                           {White won a nice game 1-0 in around thirty total moves.} [replay] ]   

 

     6...h5!?  (Too aggressive?)    
True to his style of playing chess, Nakamura chooses an extremely belligerent line, yet this might be going a bit overboard, at least in my opinion.   
(6...h5!? is not new, although it is seldom used. See the famous encounter:  GM J. Nunn - GM N. Short; / Hoogovens / Wijk ann Zee, 1990.  
 {White won a sharp game, 1-0 in just 33 total moves.} [replay] )   

 

 

gotm_jan-2013__pos3.jpg, 56 KB

   r1bqkbnr/pp3pp1/2np4/1N2p2p/4P3/6P1/PPP2P1P/RNBQKB1R w KQkq h6 0 7   

 

6...Be7;  looked to be a much safer path for the second player. (See below.)  

 

                         [ A more conventional way of playing would have been:   
                           (>/=) 6...Be77.Bg2 Be68.N1c3 a69.Na3 Nf610.0-0, "+/="  10...0-0;  "~"  (unclear)   
                           when White is slightly better, yet the second player has fairly good play in this position.  

                           (I searched the database, there were only a handful of games - with this position.   
                            However, none of these were between GM's or even players with a FIDE rating of over 2400.) ]  

 

The next few moves are normal, first Black kicks back the dangerous White Knight on b5; and then both sides simply develop their pieces. 
(After 8...b7-b5; I cannot find any matches to this game in any DB.)  
     7.N1c3 a68.Na3 b5N (The first new move of this game.)   9.Nd5 Nge710.Bg2 Bg4!?   
Again, this is very aggressive ... 
and there may not be anything really wrong with it. Yet I must point out that Fritz found a much simpler continuation that probably yields Black easy equality. 

 

                         [ Black gets a quick and fairly simple path to equality by playing the following continuation:   
                            >/=  RR 10...Nxd5!11.exd5 Ne712.c3 Bg4;  "="  (equal)  when all the engines agree   
                            that Black has a solid game ... with no real problems here. ]   

 

   11.f3 Be612.c3 h4 13.Nc2 Bxd5!? (Dubious?)   
Black rids himself of his backward Pawn and also gets rid of the monster of a WN on the most important d5-square ... ... ...   

 

 

gotm_jan-2013__pos4.jpg, 55 KB

   r2qkb1r/4npp1/p1np4/1p1bp3/4P2p/2P2PP1/PPN3BP/R1BQK2R w KQkq - 0 14   

 

Yet it seems to me to be a very bad idea for Black to give up his important light-squared Bishop at this stage of the game. 
(This point seems to be the beginning of most of Black's problems in this particular stress-filled encounter ... 
watching the live feed from the official website, Nakamura {at times} seemed to be in real, physical discomfort.)  

 

                         [ Another possibility was:  RR  13...h3!?14.Bf1 Bd7 15.Nce3 Nxd516.Nxd5, "+/="  (A small edge for White.)   
                           when White may be a bit better, yet this is still a substantial improvement over the course of the actual game.   

                                         ******************************************************************************************    

                           Clearly - the best variation was the following continuation:    
                            >/= 13...Na5!14.f4 Rc8 15.Ncb4 exf416.Nxf4, "+/="    
                            when Fritz, Rybka and Houdini agree that White has a small edge, yet it is less than 25/100. ]   

 

     14.exd5 Na515.f4! (center / initiative)    
Clearly this was the most active continuation here for White. 
(White gains space, attacks the center, unleashes his KB, and also plans to use the f-file after he castles Kingside.)  

 

                         [ RR 15.Ne3!?, "+/="  (White is slightly better.) ]   

 

The next few moves all look to be be forced and/or best ... for both sides, here. 
(Some programs like 16.Qf3, {instead} in this line for White. And </= 16...Nh6?; 17.0-0! was just about winning for White.) 
     15...Nf516.g4! h3 17.Be4 Nh4?!  (An error?)   
Clearly, this was already a bad play for Nakamura, who was consuming a lot of time on his chess clock.   

 

                         [ A big improvement would have been the following line here:    
                           >/= 17...Qh4+; ('!')  18.Kf1 Ne719.Qe2, "+/="  (A solid edge for White.)   
                           and while Carlsen is somewhat better here, it is not inconceivable that    
                           Black could hang on for an eventual draw. ]   

 

     18.0-0, "+/"  (White is clearly better.)   
This has got to be one of those cases where Black has been left to scratch his head and wonder exactly where he went wrong ...   

 

 

gotm_jan-2013__pos5.jpg, 54 KB

   r2qkb1r/5pp1/p2p4/np1Pp3/4BPPn/2P4p/PPN4P/R1BQ1RK1 b kq - 0 18   

 

Not only does Black have a bad game, it is not easy to find a plan of logical development where Black does not end up shedding a decisive amount of material.   

 

                         [ RR 18.fxe5 dxe519.Qe2, "+/=" ]   

 

     18...g6!?  (hmmm)    
This makes even more holes in Black's position, maybe better was the box's suggestion of playing the BQ to the c8-square.    

 

 

Now 20.g5!, was practically winning here for White. (At least, according to the strong chess engine, Fritz 13.) 

Note that - in a wide open board - Carlsen decides to safely shelter his King in the corner. 
     19.Kh1!? Bg7?!;   (A bad play.)    
It's easy to understand that Black wants to get a little development going ... 
and also cover his gaping dark-squared weaknesses. 

However, this was - for all intents and purposes - a virtual blunder here for Nakamura, who had to play 19...f5![]; which may have even saved his game. 
(Both Fritz and Houdini agree that 19...f7-f5!; was the best move for Black.)  

 

   *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***     *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***      *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***     

 

     20.f5!?,   (Too routine?)    
While this certainly gives White a big edge, it is far from being the best continuation here. 
(See the line given, just below.)   

 

                         [ A definite improvement was:  >/=  20.fxe5! Bxe5;  

                                          ( Or </= 20...dxe5?!; 21.d6!,  "+/-")   
                           

                           21.Nd4!, '±'  (+/)   (White is clearly better.)    
                           Analysis - Fritz 13 & also the very powerful engines, Rybka and Houdini. ]  

 

     20...gxf521.gxf5!?  (Sub-optimal?)    
This is OK, and White even gets a nice solid edge with this move. But I feel compelled to point out that the machine chooses a completely different line.   

 

                         [ Rybka, Houdini, Fritz and also Shredder all prefer the following variation over what was chosen in the actual game:   
                           (>/=)  RR  21.Bxf5 Bh622.Bxh6 Rxh6 23.Qe2 Qg524.Ne3,  "+/="  (White has a small advantage here.)   

                            and White is solidly better. (The main difference between this line and the actual game continuation is that the first    
                            player rids himself of his LSB, which was potentially a bad Bishop.) ]   

 

     21...Ng2?  (Simply terrible!)    
This looks risky - and it was. 
(In fact, this could be the losing move for Black. It causes the Fritz engine's red light to come on the the evaluations to go crazy. After things settle down ... 
 after a few minutes of machine time ... the box shows that White should have a won game.)  

The other aspect of this move is that Carlsen now gets a grip on the game, and from here (until resignation), he never relinquishes his iron control over the board.   

 

     22.f6! Bf8 (hmmm)   
To capture on f6 ... or not to capture? (That is the question!)   

 

               [ Black is also losing after the following continuation here:    
                 RR  22...Bxf623.Qf3 Rh4 24.Bg5 Nf425.Bxh4 Bxh4 26.Rg1 Kd727.Nd4! Qf628.Ne6!,  "+/-"  (White has a won game.)  
                 and Black can delay the end of the game for a while, but it is certain that he will lose. ]   

 

Now Fritz likes 23.Bf5!, while Houdini prefers 23.Qe2.  (Just about everything is winning here for White.)    
     23.Qf3 Qc724.Nb4 Nb7 25.Nc6 Nc526.Bf5!  (Best.)   
After missing it a couple of times, Carlsen finally discovers the same path that the metal monster likes.   

 

                         [ RR  26.Bd2!? Nxe427.Qxe4,  "+/="  ]  

 

Now Black is lost, he cannot even castle here. (The box chooses 26...a5; but it also shows that Black's position is pretty much hopeless.)   
     26...Nd727.Bg5 Rg8!?;    
Black attempts to gain a little activity for his pieces.   

Objectively, 27...Nb8; and/or 27...Nc5; were both to be preferred over this move. 
(It would be useless to attach a full question mark here. Black must perish, all that remains is for Nakamura to chose the method of his execution.)  

 

Now White finds the winning idea of Qh5, with the simple threat of Qh7, winning material.   
     28.Qh5! Nb629.Be6 Rxg5[]30.Qxg5 fxe631.dxe6,  "+/-"  (White has a decisive edge.)  
Black has had all that he can stand - and wastes no time in giving up his sinking ship.   

 

 

gotm_jan-2013__pos6.jpg, 49 KB

   r3kb2/2q5/pnNpPP2/1p2p1Q1/8/2P4p/PP4nP/R4R1K b q - 0 31   

 

Relentless play by Carlsen who swamps America's best player ... and even had the gall to make it look rather easy, as well. 
(BTW - Magnus tied Garry's record for the best score in Wijk aan Zee, with 10/13.)   

 

   Copyright (c) A.J. Goldsby, 2013. All rights reserved.    

 

   1 - 0   


  The analysis for this page was prepared with the excellent programChessBase 10.0. (My main engines are Fritz 12, Fritz 13, and I also use Houdini 1.5.)  

  The HTML was polished with several different tools and programs, (mostly FP)  ...  the text was checked for spelling with MS Word.  

  Please note!:  Due to the fact that I upgraded to <<Windows 7>> ... I no longer have the use of the program, "Chess Captor." 


Click  HERE  to return to my  HOME Page  for this site. 

Click  HERE  to go (or return) to my "games list," for the  year of 2013.  

Click  HERE  to go to (or return to) my (main/big/old GC) web-site.

Click  HERE  to go (or return) to my  GC  page for  "The Game of The Month."  

(Or use the "back" button on your web browser.)  

  Click  HERE  to go to my first domain,  or click  HERE  to go to my second domain.  

 *** 

  This page was first posted on/in:  late 2012.     Final format completed on: Wednesday; February 6th, 2013.      This page was last updated on 03/17/15 .  


    COPYRIGHT (c) A.J. Goldsby I;    

    Copyright (©) A.J. Goldsby; 1985 - 2014, & 2015.  All rights reserved.    


Free Counters
Free Counters