Supplementary game # 01, September, 2004. |
My "Game Of The Month" Feature has been quite popular... and has generated a ton of e-mail. The last two months, I guarantee I have gotten around 35 e-mails per month about this feature. (11 in one day!! I am sure that this is close to a personal record.) People never cease to amaze me, or have ideas for what I can do with this feature. Keep sending those letters and e-mails! I guarantee you that I read every single one. Here I find a game that has already been analyzed in several newspaper columns and in at least one major on-line "Net-zine." And it makes the perfect match for my "Game Of The Month" feature. For those people who truly hate the Sicilian and cannot bear the thought of one more of this kind of game, I can only apologize and tell you that it is a popular opening!! Please ... take a look. Enjoy! |
Click HERE to see a fairly detailed explanation of all the symbols I use in annotating a chess game.
Click HERE to replay this game ... on another web site. (NOT MY SITE!!! I am not responsible for the content.)
Click HERE for yet another version/take of/on this game.
GM Emil Sutovsky
(2679) - GM Abhijit
Kunte (2532)
|
***********************************
See the main game {for this month} for a complete breakdown of the opening.
[ Also possible is:
5...Nc6!?;
and also (of course)
5...Nf6;
{Diagram?}
with a good game for Black ...
with either move here. ]
6.Bd3 Nf6;
7.Qe2!?,
Did White play this move to get
his opponent out of book? Or is
this line a specialty of Sutovsky's?
[ More 'normal' is: 7.0-0, "+/=" {Diagram?} with a slight edge for White. ]
7...b5!?,
('?!')
{See the diagram ... just below here.}
I know this is a 'book' line here,
but to me it is rather too risky.
***********************************
***********************************
With forcing moves, White gets a fairly large and distinct advantage.
[ Probably better is:
(>/=)
7...d6; 8.f4, "+/="
{Diagram?}
and while White is solidly better
here, it hardly seems likely that
Black will be blown off the board ...
the second player's position
is
just too solid here! ]
8.e5! b4!?;
(hmmm)
{See the diagram - just below.}
OK ... we are out of my 'book'
knowledge. Further - I could not
find this particular line anywhere.
(It is possible it was buried in a
sub-line in ECO ... and maybe
I just missed it. NCO, page 185 -
has some lines similar to this;
but I saw nothing that included
both Bd3 and an early Qe2.)
***********************************
***********************************
Black appears to be playing with fire.
[ Ugly was: 8...Ng8; 9.Bf4, '±' {D?} but maybe this was safer than what occurred in the game. ]
9.Ncb5! axb5;
10.Nxb5, (TN?)
This - of course - looks great for
White ... taking on f6 was also a
fairly viable option here.
[ The only other game that I could
find in the database was:
10.exf6!? gxf6; 11.Nxb5 Qb6;
{Diagram?}
If instead, the move of ...Qb7;
here would have transposed
into this game.
12.Qf3 Ra5?; {Diagram?} This looks very doubtful.
( >/= 12...d5 []; 13.Qxf6, '±' )
13.Qxf6 Rg8; 14.Be3 Bc5;
15.Nd4 d6!?; 16.Nb3!?,
{Diagram?}
This looks rather tame, Bxh7,
or even Rg1 - was probably
better than this.
( The simplest was: 16.g3, '±' )
16...Bxe3[]; 17.Nxa5,
"+/=" ('±')
{Diagram?}
White went on to win in 39 moves
in this entertaining struggle.
E. Najer
(2606) - K. Landa (2550);
/
The 57th Russian Championships
(Qualifying Tournament)
/
St. Petersburg (R7), RUS; 2004. ]
10...Qb7?!;
{See the diagram - just below here.}
This looks too passive, a more
active move was called for here.
(Like >/= 10...Qc5.)
***********************************
***********************************
How can you play a move like an early ...b5!?!!!!??!; and then get wimpy with a move like this?
[ The move of: 10...Qb6; {Diag?} transposes to the note above. ]
11.exf6 gxf6;
This looks more-or-less forced,
the capture on g2 loses outright to
the simple move of Be4 here.
**************************************************************************************************
Now both Be4 and the move
actually utilized in the game ...
are very attractive for White.
12.Bf4!,
'±' 12...Ra5;
{See the diagram - just below.}
It is time for another diagram.
***********************************
***********************************
White is so much better here it is not even funny!!! ('±' or even "+/-".)
[ Not: </= 12...d5?; 13.Nc7+, etc. ]
13.Bc4!?,
(hmmm)
{See the diagram ... just below.}
Not at all bad or even inferior,
but maybe a tiny bit unnecessary?
***********************************
***********************************
{Apparently Sutovsky wants to castle on the Queen-side ... but does not want to worry about losing his QRP.}
[ The box prefers:
(>/=) 13.0-0 Na6; 14.a4 bxa3!?;
15.bxa3 Qc6!?;
16.Na7 Qa8;
17.Nxc8 Qxc8; 18.Rfb1,
'±' {Diagram?}
White is clearly better here,
if not just winning outright. ]
13...Nc6!?;
(Maybe - '?!')
Black plays aggressively here ...
when the move that defended the
a6-square might have been just
a little wiser.
[ Maybe better was: (>/=) 13...Na6; to prevent the Knight check. ]
14.0-0-0!?,
{See the diagram - just below here.}
Very wild, very complicated.
***********************************
***********************************
I no longer have a real clue as to what is going on here!
[ Better is: >/= 14.Rd1!, '±' - Fritz. ]
14...b3!;
15.cxb3!?,
This is really crazy ... why would
White willingly bust up his own
Pawn structure???
[ >/= 15.axb3 e5!?; 16.Kb1!, '±' ]
15...Rxa2;
16.Kb1, ('!')
Definitely the safest move now
for White.
[ Possible was: </= 16.Bd6!?, "~" {D?} (completely unclear) ]
Now
White intensifies the pressure.
16...Ra5;
('!?')
{See the diagram - just below.}
***********************************
***********************************
17.Rd5!
Be7!?;
The box prefers ...Rg8; here.
18.Rhd1!,
(Maybe - '!!')
{See
the diagram - just below here.}
White continues to increase the
pressure by mobilizing all of his
forces to the critical part of the
chess board.
***********************************
***********************************
Neither player can be accused of being un-original or backing away from a fight here!!!!!
[ 18.Nd6+!? Bxd6; 19.Bxd6, "+/=" ]
18...Rg8;
19.Nc7+!!,
{See the diagram - just below.}
At first this looks just like a random
move and the proof of the very old
saying:
"Patzer see a check, potzer
take a check!"
***********************************
***********************************
This is a good place for a "look-see." {diagram?}
[ Easy was: 19.g3!, '±' {Diag?} with a solid edge for White. ]
Black's reply appears forced.
19...Kd8[];
20.Rxd7+!?,
{See
the diagram - just below.}
Super-ULTRA brilliant ... ('!!!')
or simply an inaccurate move? {Probably the former, here!}
***********************************
***********************************
After several DAYS of studying this game ... I am still NOT SURE!!! :p
[ When I was first going over this
fantastic clash, I expected
something like the following:
(>/=)
20.Rxa5!? Nxa5; 21.Ba6,
"+/=" ('±') {Diag?}
with White clearly on top.
(One version of ChessMaster
prefers this line here.) ]
Black's next two moves are
- without question - 100% forced.
20...Bxd7;
21.Rxd7+! Kc8[];
{See the diagram - just below here.}
I am sure that Black would like
to play something else here ...
***********************************
***********************************
It is easy too see how uncomfortable Black's King is here ... almost completely surrounded by his opponent's pieces.
[ But definitely not:
</= 21...Kxd7??;
22.Bxe6+! fxe6; 23.Qxe6+ Kd8; 24.Qxg8+,
etc.
White has an easy win. ("+/-")
]
22.Bxe6!!,
(wow)
{See
the diagram - just below.}
Here Sutovsky should be penalized
30 yards ... for un-necessary
roughness, ... AND totally reckless
behavior!!
***********************************
***********************************
I guess Emil must have eaten his Wheaties before this game!
[ Or 22.b4!? Qxb4; "~" ]
22...Ne5?;
(Urgh)
Under severe duress, Black
begins to falter. (Problems with
the clock here?)
[ Black had to try:
>/= 22...Re5[];
23.Bxe5 fxe6; 24.Rxe7 Nxe7;
25.Bd6 Qc6; 26.Qxe6+ Qd7;
27.Qc4!, "+/=" ("±")
{Diagram?}
when White is better ... but a
clear, forced win might still be
a long way off here.
******************************************************************
Simply losing outright was:
</= 22...fxe6?;
23.Qxe6 Qa7; {Diagram?}
The box says that this is forced.
( </= 23...Nd8??; 24.Rxd8+! Kxd8; 25.Qxg8+, ("+/-") and mates. )
24.Rxe7+! Kb8; 25.Nb5+!, "+/-" {Diag?} and D.J. says it is mate in 4. ]
23.Nb5!,
(Very nice.)
A rather unexpected zwischenzug.
(It also wins the Black Queen.)
[ Or
23.Na6 fxe6; 24.Rxb7,
"+/=" {Diag?}
and White will still have to
work
very hard to prove the win. ]
23...Qxb5!?;
I don't think it matters anymore
what Black plays from here.
[ After the moves:
</= 23...Nxd7?!; 24.Qc4+ Kd8;
25.Bc7+ Ke8;
26.Bxf7+ Kf8; 27.Bxg8,
("+/-") {Diagram?}
Black will have to play major
give-away to try and stop the
impending mate on f7.
*******************************************************************
Black is also in a bad way after
the following moves:
"=" 23...fxe6!?; 24.Rxb7 Kxb7;
25.Qe4+! Kb6; 26.Be3+!, "+/-"
{Diag?}
and the end is near. ]
The
rest really requires no comment.
24.Rd5+!
fxe6; 25.Rxb5 Rxb5; 26.Qxb5 Rg6!?; 27.Qe8+!,
"+/-" {Diagram?}
Black
pretty much realizes that he is dead lost here and decides to graciously
resign.
(If now ...Bd8; then simply QxP/e6+ is a relatively easy win, especially
if you are a GM.)
An
extremely wild game, but maybe one that was not completely
sound.
(But it was sure a lot of fun!!!!!)
*******
Copyright (c) A.J. Goldsby, 2004. All rights reserved.
-----> (HTML code, initially) Generated with ChessBase 8.0
Click HERE to return to my HOME Page for this site.
Click HERE to go (or return) to my "games list," for the year of 2004.
Click HERE to go to (or return to) my (main/big) GeoCities web-site.
Click HERE to go (or return) to my GC page for "The Game of The Month."
Click here to go to my first domain, click here to go to my second domain.
(Or use the "back" button on your web browser.)
Click HERE to go/return to my main game for September, 2004.
*******
I finished analyzing this game like on the 10th or 11th of September ... although I have gone back many times to look at it.
This page was finished a few days ago ... and was posted on Monday; September 13th, 2004. Last update: March 18, 2015 . Last edit or save on: 03/18/2015 .
COPYRIGHT (c) A.J. Goldsby I;
Copyright (©) A.J. Goldsby, 2015. All rights reserved.