Supplementary game # 01, September, 2004 


My "Game Of The Month" Feature has been quite popular... and has generated a ton of e-mail. The last two months, I guarantee I have gotten around 35 e-mails per month about this feature. (11 in one day!! I am sure that this is close to a personal record.)

People never cease to amaze me, or have ideas for what I can do with this feature. Keep sending those letters and e-mails! I guarantee you that I read every single one.  

Here I find a game that has already been analyzed in several newspaper columns and in at least one major on-line "Net-zine." And it makes the perfect match for my "Game Of The Month" feature. 

For those people who truly hate the Sicilian and cannot bear the thought of one more of this kind of game, I can only apologize and tell you that it is a popular opening!! Please ... take a look. Enjoy!  


  Click  HERE    to see a fairly detailed explanation of all the symbols I use in annotating a chess game.  

 Click  HERE  to replay this game ... on another web site. (NOT MY SITE!!! I am not responsible for the content.) 

 Click  HERE  for yet another version/take of/on this game. 


  GM Emil Sutovsky (2679) - GM Abhijit Kunte (2532)  
  [B43]  
  ICT / Pune, IND (R2); / 04,09,2004.  

 [A.J. Goldsby I] 

Supplementary Game (# 01) for the September (2004) "Game of The Month." (From TWIC # 513.)
[ My website for this feature is {now} located at: http://www.ajschess.com/thegotmman/index.html. It was at: http://www.geocities.com/TheGOTMman/index.html.   
  Please note that GeoCities was closed in around 2007 ... although many of the web pages remained active for a long time. Nowadays, I do not think that any of the 
  old GC sites are available, except in web archives. ]  

I could think of dozens - perhaps even hundreds - of good reasons to try and annotate this game.  

But a few of the best are:
# 1.)  It makes a handy footnote to the main game for this month;
# 2.)  It is tactical, and a real slug-fest.
# 3.)  I just plain liked it!  

  **********************************************************************************************  

The FIDE ratings are given with this game are presumably correct.  

 1.e4 c5;  2.Nf3 e6;  3.Nc3 a6;     
A fairly standard Sicilian.  

Now we transpose back into an Open Sicilian after White plays the standard pawn break of d2-d4.   
 4.d4 cxd4;  5.Nxd4 Qc7;   {See the diagram - just below.}      
We have {now} transposed into a Paulsen (Kan?) System of the Sicilian Defense.  

 

  ***********************************  

 The position just after ...Qc7. (gotm_09-04a_pos1.jpg, 23 KB)

  ***********************************  

 

See the main game {for this month} for a complete breakdown of the opening.  

     [ Also possible is: 5...Nc6!?;  and also (of course)   5...Nf6; {Diagram?}   
        with a good game for Black ... with either move here. ]   

 

 6.Bd3 Nf6;  7.Qe2!?,    
Did White play this move to get his opponent out of book? Or is this line a specialty of Sutovsky's?  

     [ More 'normal' is:  7.0-0, "+/="  {Diagram?}   with a slight edge for White. ]   

 

 7...b5!?, ('?!')   {See the diagram ... just below here.}    
I know this is a 'book' line here, but to me it is rather too risky.  

 

  ***********************************  

 Black has just advanced his b-pawn.  (gotm_09-04a_pos2.jpg, 23 KB)

  ***********************************  

 

With forcing moves, White gets a fairly large and distinct advantage.  

     [ Probably better is:   (>/=) 7...d68.f4,  "+/="  {Diagram?}     
       and while White is solidly better here, it hardly seems likely that  
       Black will be blown off the board ... the second player's position  
       is just too solid here! ]  

 

 8.e5! b4!?;  (hmmm)   {See the diagram - just below.}      
OK ... we are out of my 'book' knowledge. Further - I could not find this particular line anywhere.   
(It is possible it was buried in a sub-line in ECO ... and maybe I just missed it. NCO, page 185 -   
 has some lines similar to this; but I saw nothing that included both Bd3 and an early Qe2.)  

 

  ***********************************  

 Black has just played ...b5-b4!?  (gotm_09-04a_pos3.jpg, 23 KB)

  ***********************************  

 

Black appears to be playing with fire.  

     [ Ugly was:  8...Ng89.Bf4, '±'  {D?}  but maybe this was safer than what occurred in the game. ]   

 

 9.Ncb5! axb5;  10.Nxb5,  (TN?)   
This - of course - looks great for White ... taking on f6 was also a fairly viable option here.  

     [ The only other game that I could find in the database was:  
        10.exf6!? gxf611.Nxb5 Qb6{Diagram?}    
        If instead, the move of ...Qb7; here would have transposed into this game.  

       12.Qf3 Ra5?{Diagram?}  This looks very doubtful.   

            ( >/= 12...d5 []; 13.Qxf6, '±' )        

       13.Qxf6 Rg814.Be3 Bc515.Nd4 d6!?16.Nb3!?{Diagram?}      
       This looks rather tame, Bxh7, or even Rg1 - was probably better than this.  

            ( The simplest was: 16.g3, '±' )       

       16...Bxe3[]17.Nxa5, "+/="  ('±')   {Diagram?}   
       White went on to win in 39 moves in this entertaining struggle.   

       E. Najer (2606) - K. Landa (2550); / The 57th Russian Championships  
       (Qualifying Tournament) / St. Petersburg (R7), RUS; 2004. ]  

 

 10...Qb7?!;   {See the diagram - just below here.}     
This looks too passive, a more active move was called for here.  
 (Like >/= 10...Qc5.)  

 

  ***********************************  

 Black just placed his Queen on b7 ... I am not sure what this move really does.  (gotm_09-04a_pos4.jpg, 22 KB)

  ***********************************  

 

How can you play a move like an early ...b5!?!!!!??!; and then get wimpy with a move like this?  

     [ The move of:  10...Qb6; {Diag?}  transposes to the note above. ]   

 

 11.exf6 gxf6;      
This looks more-or-less forced, the capture on g2 loses outright to the simple move of Be4 here.   

 

  **************************************************************************************************   

Now both Be4 and the move actually utilized in the game ... are very attractive for White.   
 12.Bf4!, '±'  12...Ra5;  {See the diagram - just below.}     
It is time for another diagram.  

 

  ***********************************  

Black just played ...Ra5 here. (gotm_09-04a_pos5.jpg, 22 KB)

  ***********************************  

 

White is so much better here it is not even funny!!!  ('±' or even "+/-".)   

 

     [  Not:  </= 12...d5?13.Nc7+ etc.  ]  

 

 13.Bc4!?,  (hmmm)    {See the diagram ... just below.}     
Not at all bad or even inferior, but maybe a tiny bit unnecessary?    

 

  ***********************************  

  White plays "Bishop-to-c4." (gotm_09-04a_pos6.jpg, 22 KB)

  ***********************************  

 

{Apparently Sutovsky wants to castle on the Queen-side ... but does not want to worry about losing his QRP.}  

     [ The box prefers:  (>/=)  13.0-0 Na614.a4 bxa3!?15.bxa3 Qc6!?  
        16.Na7 Qa817.Nxc8 Qxc818.Rfb1, '±'  {Diagram?}   
        White is clearly better here, if not just winning outright. ]  

 

 13...Nc6!?;  (Maybe - '?!')   
Black plays aggressively here ... when the move that defended the a6-square might have been just a little wiser.   

     [ Maybe better was: (>/=) 13...Na6 to prevent the Knight check. ]  

 

 14.0-0-0!?,   {See the diagram - just below here.}      
Very wild, very complicated.  

 

  ***********************************  

 White just castled on the Queen-side.  (gotm_09-04a_pos7.jpg, 22 KB)

  ***********************************  

 

I no longer have a real clue as to what is going on here!  

     [ Better is:  >/= 14.Rd1!, '±'  - Fritz. ]   

 

 14...b3!;  15.cxb3!?,   
This is really crazy ... why would White willingly bust up his own Pawn structure???  

     [ >/= 15.axb3 e5!?; 16.Kb1!, '±' ]   

 

 15...Rxa2;  16.Kb1, ('!')    
Definitely the safest move now for White.  

     [ Possible was:  </= 16.Bd6!?, "~"  {D?}  (completely unclear) ]    

 

Now White intensifies the pressure.   
 16...Ra5;  ('!?')   {See the diagram - just below.}     

 

  ***********************************  

  Black just played his Rook  ...  BACK to the a5-square.  (gotm_09-04a_pos8.jpg, 21 KB)

  ***********************************  

 

 17.Rd5! Be7!?;  
The box prefers ...Rg8; here.  

 

 18.Rhd1!,  (Maybe - '!!')   {See the diagram - just below here.}     
White continues to increase the pressure by mobilizing all of his forces to the critical part of the chess board.  

 

  ***********************************  

  White doubles his Rooks on the d-file. (gotm_09-04a_pos9.jpg, 21 KB)

  ***********************************  

 

Neither player can be accused of being un-original or backing away from a fight here!!!!!  

     [ 18.Nd6+!? Bxd619.Bxd6, "+/=" ]   

 

 18...Rg8;  19.Nc7+!!,   {See the diagram - just below.}     
At first this looks just like a random move and the proof of the very old saying: 
 "Patzer see a check, potzer take a check!"  

 

  ***********************************  

  White just gave a big N-CHECK. (gotm_09-04a_pos10.jpg, 21 KB)

  ***********************************  

 

This is a good place for a "look-see."  {diagram?}  

 

     [ Easy was:  19.g3!, '±'  {Diag?}  with a solid edge for White. ]  

 

Black's reply appears forced.  
 19...Kd8[];  20.Rxd7+!?,   {See the diagram - just below.}    
Super-ULTRA brilliant  ...  ('!!!')  or simply an inaccurate move?  {Probably the former, here!}    

 

  ***********************************  

What the heck?? .. ... ... .. (gotm_09-04a_pos11.jpg, 21 KB)

  ***********************************  

 

After several DAYS of studying this game ... I am still NOT SURE!!! :p  

     [ When I was first going over this fantastic clash, I expected something like the following:   
        (>/=) 20.Rxa5!? Nxa521.Ba6, "+/=" ('±')  {Diag?}  with White clearly on top.   
        (One version of ChessMaster prefers this line here.) ]   

 

Black's next two moves are - without question - 100% forced.  
 20...Bxd7;  21.Rxd7+! Kc8[];   {See the diagram - just below here.}     
I am sure that Black would like to play something else here ...  

 

  ***********************************  

  Black played his King to c8 ... the Rook is immune. (gotm_09-04a_pos12.jpg, 20 KB)

  ***********************************  

 

It is easy too see how uncomfortable Black's King is here ... almost completely surrounded by his opponent's pieces.   

     [ But definitely not:  </=  21...Kxd7??22.Bxe6+! fxe623.Qxe6+ Kd824.Qxg8+, etc.   
        White has an easy win. ("+/-") ]    

 

 22.Bxe6!!,  (wow)   {See the diagram - just below.}     
Here Sutovsky should be penalized 30 yards ... for un-necessary roughness, ... AND totally reckless behavior!!   

 

  ***********************************  

  White takes on e6 ... I think Sutovsky needs aggression therapy!  (gotm_09-04a_pos13.jpg, 20 KB)

  ***********************************  

 

I guess Emil must have eaten his Wheaties before this game!   

     [ Or  22.b4!? Qxb4; "~" ]   

 

 22...Ne5?;  (Urgh)   
Under severe duress, Black begins to falter. (Problems with the clock here?)  

 

     [ Black had to try:  >/=  22...Re5[]23.Bxe5 fxe624.Rxe7 Nxe7  
       25.Bd6 Qc626.Qxe6+ Qd7 27.Qc4!, "+/="  ("±")  {Diagram?}    
       when White is better ... but a clear, forced win might still be a long way off here.  

   ******************************************************************   

       Simply losing outright was:   
       </=  22...fxe6?23.Qxe6 Qa7{Diagram?}    
       The box says that this is forced.   

            ( </=  23...Nd8??; 24.Rxd8+! Kxd8; 25.Qxg8+,  ("+/-")  and mates. )     

       24.Rxe7+! Kb825.Nb5+!,  "+/-"  {Diag?}    and D.J. says it is mate in 4. ]   

 

 23.Nb5!,  (Very nice.)    
A rather unexpected zwischenzug. (It also wins the Black Queen.)   

     [ Or  23.Na6 fxe624.Rxb7,  "+/="  {Diag?}  and White will still have to 
        work very hard to prove the win. ]   

 

 23...Qxb5!?;    
I don't think it matters anymore what Black plays from here.  

 

     [ After the moves:    </=  23...Nxd7?!24.Qc4+ Kd825.Bc7+ Ke8  
       26.Bxf7+ Kf827.Bxg8,  ("+/-")  {Diagram?}   
       Black will have to play major give-away to try and stop the impending mate on f7.  

   *******************************************************************   

       Black is also in a bad way after the following moves:  
       "="  23...fxe6!?24.Rxb7 Kxb725.Qe4+! Kb626.Be3+!,  "+/-"  {Diag?}   
       and the end is near. ]    

 

The rest really requires no comment.  
 24.Rd5+! fxe6;  25.Rxb5 Rxb5;  26.Qxb5 Rg6!?;  27.Qe8+!,  "+/-"  {Diagram?}   

Black pretty much realizes that he is dead lost here and decides to graciously resign. 
(If now ...Bd8; then simply QxP/e6+ is a relatively easy win, especially if you are a GM.)  

 

An extremely wild game, but maybe one that was not completely sound.  
(But it was sure a lot of fun!!!!!)  

 

      1 - 0    

 

  *******  

    Copyright (c) A.J. Goldsby, 2004.  All rights reserved.    


 ----->  (HTML code, initially)   Generated with  ChessBase 8.0     


Click  HERE  to return to my  HOME Page  for this site. 

Click  HERE  to go (or return) to my "games list," for the  year of 2004

Click  HERE  to go to (or return to) my (main/big) GeoCities web-site.

Click  HERE  to go (or return) to my  GC  page for  "The Game of The Month." 

Click here to go to my first domain, click here to go to my second domain.  

(Or use the "back" button on your web browser.) 

Click  HERE  to go/return to my main game for September, 2004.  

 ******* 

  I finished analyzing this game like on the 10th or 11th of September ... although I have gone back many times to look at it. 

  This page was finished a few days ago ... and was posted on  MondaySeptember 13th, 2004.   Last update:  March 18, 2015 .  Last edit or save on: 03/18/2015 .  


  COPYRIGHT (c) A.J. Goldsby I  

     Copyright (©) A.J. Goldsby, 2015. All rights reserved.